| |
The Business Buying Climate (July
2002)
At least in the Seattle area there are more business
buyers in 2002 than there have been over the past few years. Not as many as the
early to mid-nineties, but it's on the upswing.
The buyers I'm meeting are more qualified than ever
(both financially and skill wise) and are motivated. Many of my current clients
and prospective clients have owned businesses before or
own one now. Those who are corporate refugees have done more and had more
responsibility than previously. I'm sure there's a message in here about the
state of the economy but I'm not going to try to figure it out.
Finally, these buyer's are finding good businesses to
buy. Not just one or two, but numerous companies that fit their criteria and
have adequate profits. Seattle area business brokers may be asking where all the
companies are coming from (as it seems listings are slow) but they are out there
if you work hard enough to find them.
Prices
Earlier this year a broker told me he'd have a lot of
listings if the sellers could sell based on their 2000 financial statements (not
the 2001 statements). Prices are definitely down from a couple years ago. That's
because earnings are, on average, down and because expectations aren't as
"rosy" as they were a year or two ago.
Now, there are pockets that, as always, defy the
averages. Some businesses are counter-cyclical, some deal in regulated or
essential services and some just have it figured out so their plan works in any
economy. I've noticed that industrial related firms have still not bounced back
like many other industries. It's tough if you deal with aerospace, paper mills,
etc.
Financing
The seller who gets "cashed out" is rare. The
seller who insists on 100% cash at closing isn't going to sell. Recently
Business Week and the Wall Street Journal have written about how credit getting
tighter. That carries over to business acquisition loans. Recently some buyers
I'm working with have been made to jump through hoops on the following issues:
- Collateral - while bankers are quick to say
that without the first source of repayment, cash flow, they want as much
secondary source of repayment as possible. This is collateral and if there
aren't enough tangible assets within the firm they want stocks, bonds, home
equity, etc.
- Experience - This is getting an even tougher
look than before. Some institutions use this as their first line of
rejection. However, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. One client had a
couple banks tell him is background was perfect for the acquisition
candidate while others rejected him immediately on this issue.
- Buyer (and seller) money - The more money the
buyer and seller have at risk the easier it is to get a loan. That means the
deals where the buyer puts in 10%, the seller holds 10% and the bank
finances the balance are rare. More common will be deals where the bank
finances a small percentage to get the down payment higher than it would be
otherwise.
Of course, the best deal from the buyer's perspective
is to put 25-33% down, from his or her pocket, and have the seller finance the
balance. A buyer will put a lot more faith in the company if the seller has a
large portion at risk (vs. getting 90% cash at closing). And the buyer will
protect themselves if they adhere to the 50% rule, that is, no more than 50% of
profit to acquisition debt. This should provide enough of a cushion to weather
any situation.
© Copyright John Martinka 2002. All rights reserved.
Click here for more free advice
who we are ·
what we do ·
who we serve ·
free advice ·
speaking ·
contact ·
tip of the week ·
store ·
shopping cart ·
home

© 2000, Business Resource Group, john@johnmartinka.com
425-576-1814 · fax 206-374-8262 · PO Box 8146, Kirkland, WA 98034
|
|